Direct link to this page: http://www.hta.ac.uk/1190
Details of HTA journal title
Last updated: 12 November 2008 - Next update due: 18 November 2008
Research type:
|
NICE Technology Assessment Report (TAR) |
Title (lead author) etc:
|
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine for Alzheimer's disease (Clegg) 137 pages, Volume 5, number 1 |
Link to NICE guidance page
|
|
DOI
|
10.3310/hta5010 |
View/print executive summary
View/print minisummary in rtf format
View full text in pdf format (615 KB)
This title is available on our CD-ROM of the journal.
Order a CD-ROM - free of charge worldwide.
|
Outputs in journals arising from this project
|
Project ref: |
00/08/01 |
Original project title: |
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine for Alzheimer's disease |
Chief Investigator: |
Southampton Health Technology Assessment Centre (SHTAC), University of Southampton
|
Start Date: |
May 2000. |
Publication date: |
March 2001
|
Cost: |
This project was commissioned by the HTA programme on behalf of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence on a call-off contract basis |
MeSH* index primary terms: |
ALZHEIMER-DISEASE Q-drug-therapy; DONEPEZIL Q-therapeutic-use; RIVASTIGMINE Q-therapeutic-use (* = Medical Subject Headings) |
MeSH* index secondary terms: |
HUMAN; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS (* = Medical Subject Headings) |
NRR* number, if applicable: |
N0484078124 (*National Research Register) |
Project Protocol: |
Project protocol not available
|
Printed copies of this title despatched:
|
342 (Figures relate to the previous calendar month) |
Downloads/Views of electronic version from website:
|
45374 (Figures
are cumulative.) Last updated 15th October 2008. |
URL of this page: |
http://www.hta.ac.uk/1190 |
Outputs from this project
- Clegg, A; Bryant, J; Nicholson, T; McIntyre, L; De, Broe S; Gerard, K; Waugh, N. Clinical and cost effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine for Alzheimer's disease.. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2002; 18 (3) 497-507.
Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:55:50 +0000