Direct link to this page: http://www.hta.ac.uk/1244

Details of HTA journal title

Last updated: 23 December 2008 - Next update due: 13 January 2009

Research type:

NICE Technology Assessment Report (TAR) 

Title (lead author) etc:

A review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus-negative  (Chilcott) 72 pages, Volume 7, number 4

Link to NICE guidance page

DOI

10.3310/hta7040
|  View/print executive summary
|  View/print minisummary in rtf format
|  View full text in pdf format (199 KB)

| Buy a printed version of this title - cost £20.00 each. [How to order]
# This title is available on our CD-ROM of the journal.
| Order a CD-ROM - free of charge worldwide.  
Outputs in journals arising from this project

Project ref:

00/23/01 

Original project title:

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus negative women in pregnancy. 

Chief Investigator:

School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR-TAG), University of Sheffield  

Start Date:

May 2001.  

Publication date:

February 2003

Cost:

 This project was commissioned by the HTA programme on behalf of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence on a call-off contract basis

MeSH* index primary terms:

RHO(D)-IMMUNE-GLOBULIN Q-therapeutic-use; RH_ISOIMMUNIZATION Q-therapy (* = Medical Subject Headings)

MeSH* index secondary terms:

HUMAN; PREGNANCY; FEMALE  (* = Medical Subject Headings)

NRR* number, if applicable:

N0484104345 (*National Research Register) 

Project Protocol:

Project protocol not available

Printed copies of this title despatched:

202 (Figures relate to the previous calendar month)

Downloads/Views of electronic version from website:

32621 (Figures are cumulative.) Last updated 15th October 2008.

URL of this page:

http://www.hta.ac.uk/1244

Outputs from this project

  • Lloyd, Jones M.; Wray, J.; Wight, J.; Chilcott, J.; Forman, K.; Tappenden, P.; Beverley, C.. A review of the clinical effectiveness of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus (RhD) negative women who are pregnant. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111(9):903.
  • Chilcott, J; Lloyd, Jones M; Wight, J; Tappenden, P; Forman, K; Wray, J; Beverley, C. The cost-effectiveness of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus (RHD) negative. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111(9):903-7.
Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:27 +0000

Advanced search How to use the search function