Direct link to this page: http://www.hta.ac.uk/1244
Details of HTA journal title
Last updated: 23 December 2008 - Next update due: 13 January 2009
Research type:
|
NICE Technology Assessment Report (TAR) |
Title (lead author) etc:
|
A review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus-negative (Chilcott) 72 pages, Volume 7, number 4 |
Link to NICE guidance page
|
|
DOI
|
10.3310/hta7040 |
View/print executive summary
View/print minisummary in rtf format
View full text in pdf format (199 KB)
This title is available on our CD-ROM of the journal.
Order a CD-ROM - free of charge worldwide.
|
Outputs in journals arising from this project
|
Project ref: |
00/23/01 |
Original project title: |
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus negative women in pregnancy. |
Chief Investigator: |
School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR-TAG), University of Sheffield
|
Start Date: |
May 2001. |
Publication date: |
February 2003
|
Cost: |
This project was commissioned by the HTA programme on behalf of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence on a call-off contract basis |
MeSH* index primary terms: |
RHO(D)-IMMUNE-GLOBULIN Q-therapeutic-use; RH_ISOIMMUNIZATION Q-therapy (* = Medical Subject Headings) |
MeSH* index secondary terms: |
HUMAN; PREGNANCY; FEMALE (* = Medical Subject Headings) |
NRR* number, if applicable: |
N0484104345 (*National Research Register) |
Project Protocol: |
Project protocol not available
|
Printed copies of this title despatched:
|
202 (Figures relate to the previous calendar month) |
Downloads/Views of electronic version from website:
|
32621 (Figures
are cumulative.) Last updated 15th October 2008. |
URL of this page: |
http://www.hta.ac.uk/1244 |
Outputs from this project
- Lloyd, Jones M.; Wray, J.; Wight, J.; Chilcott, J.; Forman, K.; Tappenden, P.; Beverley, C.. A review of the clinical effectiveness of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for rhesus (RhD) negative women who are pregnant. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111(9):903.
- Chilcott, J; Lloyd, Jones M; Wight, J; Tappenden, P; Forman, K; Wray, J; Beverley, C. The cost-effectiveness of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus (RHD) negative. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 111(9):903-7.
Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:18:27 +0000