Details of HTA journal title
Last updated: 23 December 2008 - Next update due: 13 January 2009
Research type: |
Methodology |
Title (lead author) etc: |
Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. A review (Moher) 98 pages, Volume 3, number 12 |
DOI |
10.3310/hta3120 |
View/print executive summary
View/print minisummary in rtf format
View full text in pdf format (538 KB)
 This title is available on our CD-ROM of the journal. Order a CD-ROM - free of charge worldwide.
|
|
|
Outputs in journals arising from this project
| |
Project ref: |
93/52/04 |
Original project title: |
Assessing the quality of randomised controlled trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses |
Chief Investigator: |
Dr David Moher, Director, Chalmers Research Group, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute |
Start Date: |
November 1995. |
Publication date: |
May 1999 |
Cost: |
£72,583 |
MeSH* index primary terms: |
META-ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIALS Q-standards; QUALITY-ASSURANCE-HEALTH-CARE (* = Medical Subject Headings) |
MeSH* index secondary terms: |
BIAS-(EPIDEMIOLOGY); NATIONAL-HEALTH-SERVICE; GUIDELINES; HUMAN (* = Medical Subject Headings) |
NRR* number, if applicable: |
N0484008263 (*National Research Register) |
Project Protocol: |
Project protocol not available |
Printed copies of this title despatched: |
935 (Figures relate to the previous calendar month) |
Downloads/Views of electronic version from website: |
52690 (Figures are cumulative.) Last updated 15th October 2008. |
URL of this page: |
http://www.hta.ac.uk/943 |
Outputs from this project
- Moher, D; Pham, B; Cook, DJ; Jadad, AR; Moher, M; Tugwell, P; Klassen, TP. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention accuracy reported in meta-analyses?. Lancet 352, 609-613.
- Jadad, AR; Cook, DJ; Jones, A; Klassen, TP; Tugwell, P; Moher, M; Moher, D. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journals. JAMA 280 [3], 278-280.
- Cook, DJ; Jones, A; Jadad, AR; Klassen, TP; Moher, M; Tugwell, P; Moher, D. Assessing reports of randomisec trial quality in meta-analyses: a survey of reviewers, methodologists and editors. JAMA.
- Ba'Pham; Platt, R; McCauly, L; Klassen, TP; Moher, D. Is there a "best" way to detect and minimize publication bias? An empirical evaluation. Evaluation and the Health Professions, Vol 24, No. 2, pp 109-125.
News feeds